<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nfc lamination Archives - DuoMy Sensing</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.duomy.com/tag/nfc-lamination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.duomy.com/tag/nfc-lamination/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 08:33:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>How Do You Choose Between Glossy and Matte NFC Cards?</title>
		<link>https://www.duomy.com/how-do-you-choose-between-glossy-and-matte-nfc-cards/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 08:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glossy nfc cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matte nfc cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFC badges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfc card finish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFC cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfc lamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfc membership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFC sourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[softtouch nfc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spot uv nfc]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.duomy.com/how-do-you-choose-between-glossy-and-matte-nfc-cards/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>How Do You Choose Between Glossy and Matte NFC Cards? How do you choose between glossy and matte NFC cards? This is a deceptively simple question that trips&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.duomy.com/how-do-you-choose-between-glossy-and-matte-nfc-cards/">How Do You Choose Between Glossy and Matte NFC Cards?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.duomy.com">DuoMy Sensing</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>How Do You Choose Between Glossy and Matte NFC Cards?</h1>
<p>How do you choose between glossy and matte NFC cards? This is a deceptively simple question that trips up many first-time buyers, because the finish you pick changes not just how the card looks on a shelf but how it survives in a wallet, how scannable the printed QR code stays, and how premium your brand feels in a customer&#8217;s hand. When teams ask how do you choose between glossy and matte NFC cards, they are really weighing reflectivity, fingerprint visibility, print durability, and tactile perception against budget and use case. In this guide we break down the chemistry of each lamination, the real-world trade-offs, side-by-side comparison tables, and concrete case studies so you can brief your factory with the right spec the first time.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="https://img1.ladyww.cn/picture/Picture00467.jpg" alt="How Do You Choose Between Glossy and Matte NFC Cards?" /></p>
<h2>Why the Finish Question Deserves Real Attention</h2>
<p>The surface of an NFC card is a thin lamination film applied over the printed PVC, PET, or composite core. That film is either a high-gloss clear layer (glossy) or a diffuse, light-scattering layer (matte). Although both protect the print underneath, they behave very differently under light, under fingers, and over months of use.</p>
<p>When you ask how do you choose between glossy and matte NFC cards, consider four forces at work:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Light reflection:</strong> glossy mirrors overhead lights and camera flashes; matte diffuses them.</li>
<li><strong>Fingerprints and oils:</strong> glossy shows smudges immediately; matte hides them.</li>
<li><strong>Scratch visibility:</strong> glossy scratches catch light and look worse; matte scratches are subtler.</li>
<li><strong>Tactile signal:</strong> glossy feels slick and &#8220;cheap-plastic&#8221; to some; matte feels soft and &#8220;premium&#8221; to many.</li>
</ol>
<p>None of these is absolute. The right answer depends on where the card lives and what story your brand wants to tell.</p>
<h2>What Exactly Is a Glossy NFC Card?</h2>
<p>A glossy NFC card is laminated with a transparent film that has a smooth, mirror-like surface. The print colors appear more saturated and contrasty because light reflects straight back to the eye.</p>
<h3>Benefits of glossy</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Punchier color:</strong> reds and blues look deeper; photos pop.</li>
<li><strong>Easier to wipe clean:</strong> a damp cloth removes dirt.</li>
<li><strong>Lower cost:</strong> gloss lamination is the factory default and cheapest.</li>
<li><strong>Better for tiny QR codes on some readers:</strong> the flat reflective surface can help a scanner if lighting is controlled.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Drawbacks of glossy</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Glare:</strong> under direct sun or bright retail lights, the card can be hard to photograph.</li>
<li><strong>Fingerprint magnet:</strong> handled cards quickly look greasy.</li>
<li><strong>Scratch shine:</strong> once scratched, the glossy line is obvious.</li>
<li><strong>Less &#8220;luxury&#8221; cue:</strong> some premium brands avoid gloss because it reads as promotional.</li>
</ul>
<h2>What Exactly Is a Matte NFC Card?</h2>
<p>A matte NFC card uses a diffusely textured film that scatters light. Colors look slightly softer and more muted, but the surface stays readable under any lighting.</p>
<h3>Benefits of matte</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Low glare:</strong> readable in sunlight and under flash.</li>
<li><strong>Fingerprint resistant:</strong> oils are far less visible.</li>
<li><strong>Premium feel:</strong> the soft-touch version in particular signals quality.</li>
<li><strong>Subtle scratches:</strong> micro-abrasions disappear into the texture.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Drawbacks of matte</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Softer color:</strong> images look a touch flatter.</li>
<li><strong>Harder to clean:</strong> textured surface traps fine dirt; needs gentle washing.</li>
<li><strong>Slightly higher cost:</strong> matte film and soft-touch coating add a small premium.</li>
<li><strong>Ink rub risk:</strong> on cheap matte stock, heavy rubbing can wear print if not sealed well.</li>
</ul>
<h2>The Soft-Touch Variant You Should Know</h2>
<p>Between glossy and matte sits &#8220;soft-touch&#8221; (also called velvet or rubberized) lamination. It is a matte film with a tactile rubbery feel. When people ask how do you choose between glossy and matte NFC cards, we often recommend soft-touch for premium membership and hotel keycards because it delivers the matte look plus a memorable hand-feel. The downside is the highest cost and the greatest sensitivity to oils, which can slowly dull the surface.</p>
<h2>Comparison Table: Glossy vs Matte vs Soft-Touch</h2>
<p>The fastest way to decide how do you choose between glossy and matte NFC cards is to compare them on the variables that actually change outcomes.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Attribute</th>
<th>Glossy</th>
<th>Matte</th>
<th>Soft-Touch</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Color saturation</td>
<td>High</td>
<td>Medium</td>
<td>Medium</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Glare in sunlight</td>
<td>High</td>
<td>Low</td>
<td>Low</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fingerprint visibility</td>
<td>High</td>
<td>Low</td>
<td>Medium</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Scratch visibility</td>
<td>High</td>
<td>Low</td>
<td>Low</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tactile feel</td>
<td>Slick</td>
<td>Smooth paper</td>
<td>Rubbery velvet</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cleanability</td>
<td>Easy</td>
<td>Medium</td>
<td>Delicate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Relative cost</td>
<td>$</td>
<td>$$</td>
<td>$$$</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Premium perception</td>
<td>Low–Medium</td>
<td>Medium–High</td>
<td>High</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Best use</td>
<td>Promos, photos</td>
<td>Daily-use IDs</td>
<td>Luxury membership</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2>How the Finish Affects NFC Performance</h2>
<p>A common worry is whether the finish blocks the radio signal. The short answer: lamination film is thin and dielectric, so glossy versus matte makes no measurable difference to NFC read range. The chip and antenna determine performance, not the surface texture. So when you ask how do you choose between glossy and matte NFC cards, you can set RF performance aside and focus purely on ergonomics and branding.</p>
<p>One indirect effect exists: a heavily scratched glossy surface can create micro-cracks that, combined with moisture, slightly affect a card over years. Matte&#8217;s scratch resistance gives it a durability edge in harsh handling, which is why matte is favored for access badges tapped many times per day.</p>
<h2>Print Method Interactions</h2>
<p>The finish also changes how your print method looks:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Offset print:</strong> both finishes work; gloss gives the classic &#8220;photo card&#8221; look.</li>
<li><strong>Digital print:</strong> matte hides banding better than gloss.</li>
<li><strong>Hot foil stamping:</strong> foil reads richer on matte because the diffuse surface contrasts the metal.</li>
<li><strong>Spot UV:</strong> a glossy card with a matte background (or vice versa) using spot UV creates a striking raised shine pattern; this hybrid is a favorite for premium cards.</li>
</ul>
<p>When deciding how do you choose between glossy and matte NFC cards, also decide whether you want a hybrid like matte-body-with-glossy-logo via spot UV, which gives the best of both.</p>
<h2>Use-Case Decision Guide</h2>
<p>Map your scenario to a finish:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Mass loyalty promo with photos:</strong> glossy (cheap, punchy).</li>
<li><strong>Daily employee access badge:</strong> matte (hides fingerprints, resists scratches).</li>
<li><strong>Luxury hotel key or VIP club:</strong> soft-touch or matte with foil.</li>
<li><strong>Outdoor event pass:</strong> matte (low glare).</li>
<li><strong>Product authentication tag kept in box:</strong> glossy (protected, looks sharp).</li>
<li><strong>Trade-show giveaway scanned by phones:</strong> matte (phone cameras hate glare).</li>
</ol>
<p>The pattern: cards handled often and photographed often lean matte; cards stored and displayed lean glossy.</p>
<h2>Durability and Lifespan by Finish</h2>
<p>In accelerated rub tests, a sealed matte PVC card withstands roughly 20–30% more abrasion cycles before print fade than a glossy equivalent, because the textured layer is thicker and diffuses wear. Soft-touch coatings, while pleasant, can show &#8220;shine spots&#8221; where repeated thumb contact polishes the rubberized layer. For a card meant to last two years in daily use, matte is the safer engineering choice.</p>
<h2>Cost Breakdown</h2>
<p>To fully answer how do you choose between glossy and matte NFC cards, put numbers on it. On a 5,000-unit NTAG213 PVC card run:</p>
<ul>
<li>Glossy lamination: baseline, $0.18–0.28/unit depending on chip.</li>
<li>Matte lamination: +$0.01–0.03/unit for the film.</li>
<li>Soft-touch: +$0.04–0.08/unit plus sometimes a MOQ bump.</li>
<li>Spot UV hybrid: +$0.03–0.06/unit.</li>
</ul>
<p>These differences are small at volume, so finish should be chosen on experience, not penny-saving, except at very large runs where the delta compounds.</p>
<h2>Case Study 1: Co-Working Space Badges</h2>
<p>A co-working operator issued 4,000 daily access badges. They first chose glossy to save cost. Within a month, front-desk staff reported cards looked &#8220;dirty&#8221; from fingerprints and glare made the QR hard to scan at the reader. They switched the reorder to matte. Scan failures dropped and member complaints about dirty cards fell to near zero. Lesson: for high-touch daily IDs, matte pays for itself in support time saved.</p>
<h2>Case Study 2: Premium Wine Club</h2>
<p>A wine club mailed 2,000 membership cards for reorder and cellar access. They chose soft-touch matte with gold foil. Members described the card as &#8220;the nicest thing in my wallet,&#8221; and social shares of the unboxing rose. The added $0.06/unit was negligible against the $90 annual fee and drove renewal conversations. Lesson: when the card is a status symbol, the finish is part of the product, not packaging.</p>
<h2>Case Study 3: Festival Photo Promo</h2>
<p>A music festival handed out 10,000 glossy NFC photo cards linking to a gallery. Because the cards were kept in a drawer and scanned once at a booth under controlled light, glare was not an issue, and the glossy punch made the band art pop. Cost stayed minimal. Lesson: for single-scan promos stored rather than carried, glossy is rational.</p>
<h2>Multiple Approaches to Specifying Finish</h2>
<p>You have a few ways to resolve how do you choose between glossy and matte NFC cards:</p>
<h3>Approach A: Pick one finish for the whole run</h3>
<p>Simplest and cheapest. Choose matte for utility programs, glossy for promos.</p>
<h3>Approach B: Hybrid with spot UV</h3>
<p>Matte base, glossy logo via spot UV. Best premium look, modest cost add.</p>
<h3>Approach C: A/B test with a sample batch</h3>
<p>Order 200 of each, field-test with real users, then commit. Slightly higher upfront cost but removes guesswork.</p>
<p>For most brands, Approach B delivers the strongest brand signal. An experienced sourcing partner such as <a href="https://www.duomy.com">https://www.duomy.com</a> can secure spot UV tooling and sample both finishes before you scale.</p>
<h2>Environmental and Recycling Notes</h2>
<p>Glossy films are typically PET-based and recyclable where PVC/PET card recycling exists; matte films add a textured coating that some recyclers separate less cleanly. If sustainability is a stated brand value, ask for a matte finish on rPET (recycled PET) core, which keeps the premium feel while improving the material story. Avoid soft-touch if you want maximum recyclability, since the rubberized layer complicates separation.</p>
<h2>Common Mistakes When Choosing Finish</h2>
<ol>
<li>Choosing glossy for a daily badge and fighting glare all year.</li>
<li>Assuming finish affects NFC range (it does not).</li>
<li>Picking soft-touch for a grease-prone environment like a gym.</li>
<li>Under-specifying print sealing on matte, causing rub-off.</li>
<li>Forgetting that foil reads best on matte.</li>
<li>Ignoring that phone cameras struggle with glossy glare.</li>
<li>Letting a $0.02 saving drive a worse user experience.</li>
</ol>
<p>Each is avoidable once finish is treated as a UX decision.</p>
<h2>How to Brief Your Factory</h2>
<p>When you tell a factory how do you choose between glossy and matte NFC cards for your order, write the spec explicitly: material (PVC/PET/rPET), thickness, finish (glossy/matte/soft-touch), any spot UV area, chip type, encoding, and quantity. Always request a pre-production sample of the exact finish, because screen proofs do not show texture. Tap-test the sample with your real reader and photograph it under the lighting your customers will use.</p>
<h2>Finish and Brand Color Psychology</h2>
<p>When you ask how do you choose between glossy and matte NFC cards, color psychology compounds the finish effect. Glossy surfaces intensify saturated brand colors, making them feel energetic and youthful; matte surfaces mute color and feel calm, refined, and trustworthy. A fintech brand targeting professionals often chooses matte to signal stability, while a youth entertainment app may choose glossy to feel playful. Soft-touch adds a &#8220;considered&#8221; sensory memory that customers associate with care. The finish is thus a silent part of your brand voice, not merely a coating.</p>
<h2>Anti-Counterfeit Features and How Finish Interacts</h2>
<p>NFC cards are themselves an anti-counterfeit tool because the chip UID is hard to clone, but the print layer can add further security, and finish matters here. Matte surfaces take well to microtext and guilloche patterns that are difficult to photocopy. Glossy surfaces can carry a holographic overlay more visibly. A common secure treatment is a matte body with a glossy holographic stripe or a spot UV serial number, combining tamper-evidence with brand polish. When specifying anti-counterfeit print, tell the factory the finish first, because some security inks cure differently on glossy versus matte films.</p>
<h2>Laser Engraving and Finish Choice</h2>
<p>Personalization such as a member name or serial can be laser-engraved rather than printed. Engraving works best on matte and soft-touch surfaces, where the etched mark contrasts the surrounding texture. On glossy cards, laser engraving can leave a faint mark that is hard to read unless the laser burns through to a contrasting core layer (a &#8220;black core&#8221; card). If you plan to engrave names at issuance, choose matte or a dual-core card and confirm the laser settings on a sample before the personalization run.</p>
<h2>Regional and Industry Preferences</h2>
<p>Observed patterns when advising clients on how do you choose between glossy and matte NFC cards:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>East Asia retail loyalty:</strong> glossy dominates for vivid character art and photo promotions.</li>
<li><strong>European membership and fintech:</strong> matte and soft-touch favored for a restrained premium feel.</li>
<li><strong>Middle East hospitality:</strong> gold foil on matte is common for VIP perception.</li>
<li><strong>North America events:</strong> matte for outdoor festivals, glossy for indoor photo promos.</li>
<li><strong>Healthcare globally:</strong> sealed matte for cleanability and low glare.</li>
</ul>
<p>These are tendencies, not rules, but they help benchmark your choice against category norms.</p>
<h2>Case Study 4: Retail Loyalty Relaunch</h2>
<p>A pan-Asian retail chain relaunched its loyalty program with 6 million glossy NFC cards featuring cartoon mascot art. The glossy finish made the bright artwork pop on shelf displays and in-app scans at the counter under controlled light. Redemption app installs rose 22% in the first quarter. Because the cards were stored in a wallet and scanned at a fixed reader, glare was never a field issue. Lesson: for a mass visual campaign where the card is mostly seen, not handled roughly, glossy is the rational, cost-effective hero finish.</p>
<h2>Finish Behavior in Different Lighting Environments</h2>
<p>A practical way to settle how do you choose between glossy and matte NFC cards is to imagine the exact lighting where the card is used. The table below summarizes behavior.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Environment</th>
<th>Glossy</th>
<th>Matte</th>
<th>Soft-Touch</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Outdoor sunlight</td>
<td>Glare, hard to photo</td>
<td>Clear</td>
<td>Clear</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Retail spotlights</td>
<td>Reflects hotspots</td>
<td>Even</td>
<td>Even</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Office fluorescent</td>
<td>Some glare</td>
<td>Good</td>
<td>Good</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Phone photography</td>
<td>Needs angle</td>
<td>Reliable</td>
<td>Reliable</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dim lounge</td>
<td>Pops under light</td>
<td>Subtle</td>
<td>Subtle</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Trade-show booth</td>
<td>Mixed, risky</td>
<td>Safe</td>
<td>Safe</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>If your card will mostly be photographed by customers with phones, matte removes the single biggest source of failed scans: glare. Glossy only wins when lighting is controlled and the card is display-first.</p>
<h2>Storage and Protection of Finished Cards</h2>
<p>Finish also affects how cards should be stored before use. Glossy cards stacked face-to-face can stick slightly in heat; interleave with silica or pack with separator paper. Matte cards are more stable but can attract fine dust to the texture if stored uncovered. Soft-touch cards should avoid contact with rubber bands or vinyl pockets, which can transfer oils. For long shelf life, keep all finishes in a cool, dry box below 40°C and away from direct sun, and avoid stacking heavier items on top of thin cards, which can cause permanent bowing regardless of finish.</p>
<h2>How Finish Influences Perceived Card Weight and Rigidity</h2>
<p>Although finish is a surface film, the base material thickness drives rigidity more than the film does. A common misconception when debating how do you choose between glossy and matte NFC cards is that matte feels &#8220;thicker.&#8221; In reality, perceived heft comes from a composite or metal-hybrid core, not the lamination. If you want a premium heavy feel, specify a 1.0–1.2 mm PET core or a metal edge, and choose matte or soft-touch for the surface. The combination of weight plus matte texture is what reads as &#8220;expensive&#8221; in blind user tests.</p>
<h2>Case Study 5: Gym Access Fobs</h2>
<p>A gym chain issued matte NFC keyfobs for 24/7 door access. Members sweated on the fobs and sanitized them frequently. Glossy fobs from a competitor were reported as &#8220;slimy&#8221; and scratched; the matte fobs stayed presentable and scanned reliably at the outdoor side entrance where sunlight would have glared on gloss. The gym credited matte with lower front-desk callouts for &#8220;broken cards&#8221; that were actually just dirty glossy ones. Lesson: in sweaty, sunny, high-touch environments, matte is the operationally safer finish.</p>
<h2>Frequently Asked Questions</h2>
<h3>How do you choose between glossy and matte NFC cards for a daily-use ID badge?</h3>
<p>For a badge tapped and handled many times per day, matte is the better choice because it hides fingerprints, resists visible scratches, and stays readable under office and outdoor lighting. Glossy badges quickly look greasy and can glare under scanners. If budget allows, matte with a spot UV logo gives durability plus a premium accent. Reserve glossy for cards that are stored and scanned only occasionally.</p>
<h3>Does the glossy or matte finish affect NFC reading distance?</h3>
<p>No. The lamination film is thin and does not block the 13.56 MHz signal used by NFC. Read range is determined by the antenna coil size, the chip, and the reader power, not by surface gloss or texture. You can choose finish purely on look and handling. The only indirect effect is long-term: matte&#8217;s scratch resistance helps a card survive years of use better than a scratched glossy surface.</p>
<h3>Which finish looks more premium to customers?</h3>
<p>Matte and especially soft-touch finishes generally read as more premium because they diffuse light and offer a tactile, almost fabric-like feel. Glossy can look promotional or &#8220;cheap plastic&#8221; to some audiences. For luxury membership, hotel keys, and VIP clubs, matte with foil stamping or soft-touch is the standard. Glossy remains appropriate when vivid photo reproduction is the priority over perceived luxury.</p>
<h3>Is matte more expensive than glossy for NFC cards?</h3>
<p>Matte lamination typically adds a small premium of about $0.01–0.03 per card at volume, and soft-touch adds roughly $0.04–0.08. On small runs the percentage looks larger, but on 5,000+ units the difference is minor. Given the durability and branding benefits, matte is usually worth the small uplift for utility and premium programs, while glossy stays cheapest for mass promos.</p>
<h3>Can I combine glossy and matte on the same NFC card?</h3>
<p>Yes, through a process called spot UV or selective varnish. A common treatment is a matte base layer with a glossy raised logo or pattern, creating a striking tactile and visual contrast. This hybrid delivers the fingerprint resistance of matte with the pop of gloss on key artwork. Expect a modest cost increase and confirm the spot UV area in your vector artwork so the factory applies it precisely.</p>
<h3>Which finish is easier to keep clean and hygienic?</h3>
<p>Glossy finishes are easiest to wipe with a damp cloth or sanitizer because the smooth surface sheds oils. Matte traps fine dirt in its texture and needs gentler cleaning. Soft-touch is the most delicate and can dull if cleaned aggressively. For high-hygiene settings like hospitals or food service, glossy or a sealed matte is preferable, while soft-touch should be avoided where frequent disinfection is required.</p>
<h3>How does finish affect QR code or barcode scanning from phones?</h3>
<p>Glossy surfaces can produce glare that frustrates phone cameras, especially outdoors or under bright retail lights, sometimes requiring angle adjustments. Matte diffuses light and scans more reliably in varied conditions. If your card relies on customers scanning a QR code with personal phones, matte is the safer choice. Ensure the QR has adequate quiet-zone margins regardless of finish.</p>
<h3>Should I order samples of both finishes before a large run?</h3>
<p>Absolutely. Screen proofs cannot convey texture, glare, or hand-feel, and these factors drive the user experience. Order 100–200 of each finish, field-test with your actual readers and lighting, and gather user feedback. The small sample cost is negligible against a 10,000-unit mistake. A partner like <a href="https://www.duomy.com">https://www.duomy.com</a> can coordinate side-by-side samples so you compare glossy, matte, and soft-touch directly.</p>
<p>Tags: nfc cards, glossy nfc cards, matte nfc cards, soft-touch nfc, nfc card finish, spot uv nfc, nfc lamination, nfc badges, nfc membership, nfc sourcing</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.duomy.com/how-do-you-choose-between-glossy-and-matte-nfc-cards/">How Do You Choose Between Glossy and Matte NFC Cards?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.duomy.com">DuoMy Sensing</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
